Comparison of Neural Models for X-ray Image Classification in COVID-19 Detection
Jimi Togni, Romis Attux

TL;DR
This paper compares various neural network models for classifying X-ray images to detect COVID-19, highlighting DenseNet's superior accuracy and other models' high precision in a comprehensive analysis.
Contribution
It provides a comparative evaluation of eight pre-trained neural networks for COVID-19 detection in X-ray images, including accuracy, precision, and heat map analysis.
Findings
DenseNet achieved 97.64% accuracy in multiclass classification.
VGG, ResNet, and MobileNet reached 99.98% precision in binary classification.
Heat map analysis was used for model interpretability.
Abstract
This study presents a comparative analysis of methods for detecting COVID-19 infection in radiographic images. The images, sourced from publicly available datasets, were categorized into three classes: 'normal,' 'pneumonia,' and 'COVID.' For the experiments, transfer learning was employed using eight pre-trained networks: SqueezeNet, DenseNet, ResNet, AlexNet, VGG, GoogleNet, ShuffleNet, and MobileNet. DenseNet achieved the highest accuracy of 97.64% using the ADAM optimization function in the multiclass approach. In the binary classification approach, the highest precision was 99.98%, obtained by the VGG, ResNet, and MobileNet networks. A comparative evaluation was also conducted using heat maps.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsPointwise Convolution · Grouped Convolution · Groupwise Point Convolution · Xavier Initialization · Depthwise Convolution · Batch Normalization · Channel Shuffle · ShuffleNet Block · Concatenated Skip Connection · Residual Connection
