On complexity of restricted fragments of Decision DNNF
Andrea Cal\'i, Igor Razgon

TL;DR
This paper investigates the complexity of representing certain restricted fragments of Decision DNNF, establishing lower bounds, separations, and efficient operations, especially focusing on the -OBDD model and its variants for CNFs of bounded incidence treewidth.
Contribution
The paper provides a detailed complexity analysis of -OBDD and related models, including lower bounds, exponential separations, and efficient application operations, along with a new relaxed structured model.
Findings
-OBDD requires XP-size for bounded incidence treewidth CNFs.
Exponential separations between FBDD, -OBDD, and OBDD.
Efficient Apply operation in a restricted case.
Abstract
Decision \textsc{dnnf} (a.k.a. -\textsc{fbdd}) is an important special case of Decomposable Negation Normal Form (\textsc{dnnf}), a landmark knowledge compilation model. Like other known \textsc{dnnf} restrictions, Decision \textsc{dnnf} admits \textsc{fpt} sized representation of \textsc{cnf}s of bounded \emph{primal} treewidth. However, unlike other restrictions, the complexity of representation for \textsc{cnf}s of bounded \emph{incidence} treewidth is wide open. In[arxiv:1708.07767], we resolved this question for two restricted classes of Decision \textsc{dnnf} that we name -\textsc{obdd} and Structured Decision \textsc{dnnf}. In particular, we demonstrated that, while both these classes have \textsc{fpt}-sized representations for \textsc{cnf}s of bounded primal treewidth, they need \textsc{xp}-size for representation of \textsc{cnf}s of bounded incidence…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
