How to verify that a given process is a L\'evy-Driven Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Process
Ibrahim Abdelrazeq (1), Hardy Smith (1), Dinmukhammed Zhanbyrshy, (1) ((1) Rhodes College)

TL;DR
This paper presents a step-by-step methodology for verifying whether a discrete-time observed process is a Lévý-driven Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, including parameter estimation, driving process approximation, and hypothesis testing, with applications to financial data.
Contribution
It introduces a novel, practical approach for testing the Lévý-driven Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model assumptions and class membership from discrete observations.
Findings
Method successfully distinguishes Lévý-driven OU processes from other models.
Simulation results demonstrate high accuracy of the proposed tests.
Application to economic data illustrates real-world utility.
Abstract
Assuming that a L\'evy-Driven Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (or CAR(1)) processes is observed at discrete times , , , . We introduce a step-by-step methodological approach on how a person would verify the model assumptions. The methodology involves estimating the model parameters and approximating the driving process. We demonstrate how to use the increments of the approximated driving process, along with the estimated parameters, to test the assumptions that the CAR(1) process is L\'evy-driven. We then show how to test the hypothesis that the CAR(1) process belongs to a specified class of L\'evy processes. The performance of the tests is illustrated through multiple simulations. Finally, we demonstrate how to apply the methodology step-by-step to a variety of economic and financial data examples.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Statistical Process Monitoring
