An accurate and simple, asymptotically matched deprojection of the Sersic law
L. Ciotti (1), L. De Deo (1,2,3), S. Pellegrini (1,2) ((1) Department, of Physics, Astronomy, University of Bologna, (2) INAF-Osservatorio di, Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, (3) International PhD, College-Collegio Superiore, University of Bologna)

TL;DR
This paper introduces a simple, accurate, and parameter-free analytical deprojection formula for the Sersic law, applicable to a wide range of galaxy profiles, improving modeling of early-type galaxies.
Contribution
A new, asymptotically matched deprojection formula for the Sersic law that is simple, accurate, and does not rely on numerical fits, valid for all n > 1.
Findings
Maximum relative deviation is about 0.8% for de Vaucouleurs profile.
The formula accurately reproduces asymptotic behaviors at inner and outer radii.
Extension to profiles with n < 1 is also provided.
Abstract
The Sersic law reproduces very well the surface brightness profile of early-type galaxies, and therefore is routinely used in observational and theoretical works. Unfortunately, its deprojection can not be expressed in terms of elementary functions for generic values of the shape parameter . Over the years, different families of approximate deprojection formulae have been proposed, generally based on fits of the numerical deprojection over some radial range. We searched for a very simple, accurate, and theoretically motivated deprojection formula of the Sersic law, without free parameters, not based on fits of the numerical deprojection, and holding for generic . The formula has been found by requiring it to reproduce the analytical expressions for the inner and outer asymptotic expansions of the deprojected Sersic law of given , and by matching the two expansions at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
