Probably Correct Optimal Stable Matching for Two-Sided Markets Under Uncertainty
Andreas Athanasopoulos, Anne-Marie George, Christos Dimitrakakis

TL;DR
This paper addresses the challenge of efficiently identifying the left-side optimal stable matching in two-sided markets with unknown preferences, using bandit algorithms to handle noisy feedback and uncertainty.
Contribution
It introduces novel bandit algorithms for pure exploration in stable matching under preference uncertainty, providing theoretical and experimental insights.
Findings
Algorithms efficiently identify probably correct optimal stable matchings.
Theoretical bounds on sample complexity are established.
Experimental results validate the effectiveness of the proposed methods.
Abstract
We consider a learning problem for the stable marriage model under unknown preferences for the left side of the market. We focus on the centralized case, where at each time step, an online platform matches the agents, and obtains a noisy evaluation reflecting their preferences. Our aim is to quickly identify the stable matching that is left-side optimal, rendering this a pure exploration problem with bandit feedback. We specifically aim to find Probably Correct Optimal Stable Matchings and present several bandit algorithms to do so. Our findings provide a foundational understanding of how to efficiently gather and utilize preference information to identify the optimal stable matching in two-sided markets under uncertainty. An experimental analysis on synthetic data complements theoretical results on sample complexities for the proposed methods.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Auction Theory and Applications · Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
MethodsFocus
