On the numerical evaluation of wall shear stress using the finite element method

TL;DR

This paper compares finite element methods for computing wall shear stress in cardiovascular flows, introduces a boundary-flux evaluation technique, and assesses their accuracy and robustness in benchmark and patient-specific cases.

Contribution

It presents a novel boundary-flux method for WSS evaluation and analyzes the impact of finite element choices on accuracy and robustness in complex geometries.

Findings

Boundary-flux and P1 projection methods yield similar results for P1/P1 elements.

P2/P1 elements show faster convergence with boundary-flux in ideal flows.

P2/P1 elements are more robust to mesh size in patient-specific aneurysm cases.

Abstract

Wall shear stress (WSS) is a crucial hemodynamic quantity extensively studied in cardiovascular research, yet its numerical computation is not straightforward. This work aims to compare WSS results obtained from two different finite element discretizations, quantify the differences between continuous and discontinuous stresses, and introduce a novel method for WSS evaluation through the formulation of a boundary-flux problem. Two benchmark problems are considered - a 2D Stokes flow on a unit square and a 3D Poiseuille flow through a cylindrical pipe. These are followed by investigations of steady-state Navier-Stokes flow in two patient-specific aneurysms. The study focuses on P1/P1 stabilized and Taylor-Hood P2/P1 mixed finite elements for velocity and pressure. WSS is computed using either the proposed boundary-flux method or as a projection of tangential traction onto First order Lagrange (P1), Discontinuous Galerkin first order (DG-1), or Discontinuous Galerkin zero order (DG-0) space. For the P1/P1 stabilized element, the boundary-flux and P1 projection methods yielded equivalent results. With the P2/P1 element, the boundary-flux evaluation demonstrated faster convergence in the Poiseuille flow example but showed increased sensitivity to pressure field inaccuracies in patient-specific geometries compared to the projection method. In patient-specific cases, the P2/P1 element exhibited superior robustness to mesh size when evaluating average WSS and low shear area (LSA), outperforming the P1/P1 stabilized element. Projecting discontinuous finite element results into continuous spaces can introduce artifacts, such as the Gibbs phenomenon. Consequently, it becomes crucial to carefully select the finite element space for boundary stress calculations - not only in applications involving WSS computations for aneurysms.