Leader Rotation Is Not Enough: Scrutinizing Leadership Democracy of Chained BFT Consensus
Yining Tang, Runchao Han, Jianyu Niu, Chen Feng, Yinqian Zhang

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the leadership democracy of chained BFT protocols, revealing that leader rotation alone is insufficient for democracy and proposing metrics and countermeasures to enhance it.
Contribution
It introduces a unified framework with metrics for leadership democracy, analyzes protocols under attack, and proposes targeted improvements to strengthen leadership democracy.
Findings
Leader rotation alone does not ensure leadership democracy.
Adversaries can exploit voting patterns to undermine democracy.
Countermeasures can improve democracy with minimal overhead.
Abstract
With the growing popularity of blockchains, modern chained BFT protocols combining chaining and leader rotation to obtain better efficiency and leadership democracy have received increasing interest. Although the efficiency provisions of chained BFT protocols have been thoroughly analyzed, the leadership democracy has received little attention in prior work. In this paper, we scrutinize the leadership democracy of four representative chained BFT protocols, especially under attack. To this end, we propose a unified framework with two evaluation metrics, i.e., chain quality and censorship resilience, and quantitatively analyze chosen protocols through the Markov Decision Process (MDP). With this framework, we further examine the impact of two key components, i.e., voting pattern and leader rotation on leadership democracy. Our results indicate that leader rotation is not enough to provide…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Systems and Decision Making
