Bowen's Problem 32 and the conjugacy problem for systems with specification
Konrad Deka, Dominik Kwietniak, Bo Peng, Marcin Sabok

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates the impossibility of classifying symbolic systems with the specification property using concrete invariants, by constructing complex examples and analyzing the classification problem's complexity.
Contribution
It constructs symbolic systems with the specification property and shows their conjugacy relation is too complex for classification by concrete invariants.
Findings
Conjugacy relation on constructed systems is highly complex.
Classification of pointed systems with the specification property is inherently complicated.
Provides answers to open questions about classification complexity for specific systems.
Abstract
We show that Rufus Bowen's Problem 32 on the classification of symbolic systems with the specification property does not admit a solution that would use concrete invariants. To this end, we construct a class of symbolic systems with the specification property and show that the conjugacy relation on this class is too complicated to admit such a classification. More generally, we gauge the complexity of the classification problem for symbolic systems with the specification property. Along the way, we also provide answers to two questions related to the classification of pointed systems with the specification property: to a question of Ding and Gu related to the complexity of the classification of pointed Cantor systems with the specification property and to a question of Bruin and Vejnar related to the complexity of the classification of pointed Hilbert cube systems with the specification…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Formal Methods in Verification
