Revealed Social Networks
Christopher P. Chambers, Yusufcan Masatlioglu, and Christopher Turansick

TL;DR
This paper develops a revealed preference test for the linear-in-means peer effects model using choice data, and analyzes the conditions under which the model is identifiable depending on the outcome dimension.
Contribution
It introduces a new test for the linear-in-means model based on choice data and explores the model's identification properties relative to outcome dimensionality.
Findings
The test is formulated as a linear program with an incentive compatibility constraint.
Identification is generally possible when the outcome is multi-dimensional.
Failures of identification are common when the outcome is one-dimensional.
Abstract
The linear-in-means model is the standard empirical model of peer effects. Using choice data and exogenous group variation, we first develop a revealed preference style test for the linear-in-means model. This test is formulated as a linear program and can be interpreted as a no money pump condition with an additional incentive compatibility constraint. We then study the identification properties of the linear-in-means model. A key takeaway from our analysis is that there is a close relationship between the dimension of the outcome variable and the identifiability of the model. Importantly, when the outcome variable is one-dimensional, failures of identification are generic. On the other hand, when the outcome variable is multi-dimensional, we provide natural conditions under which identification is generic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSocial Media and Politics
MethodsFocus
