Estimation of partial rankings from sparse, noisy comparisons
Sebastian Morel-Balbi, Alec Kirkley

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian approach for estimating partial rankings with ties from sparse, noisy pairwise comparison data, improving interpretability over traditional methods by only distinguishing ranks when supported by sufficient evidence.
Contribution
It proposes a nonparametric Bayesian framework and a fast algorithm for MAP inference of partial rankings, addressing limitations of existing methods in sparse, noisy data scenarios.
Findings
More parsimonious data summaries than traditional ranking methods
Effective in sparse and noisy comparison settings
Applicable to real and synthetic datasets
Abstract
Ranking items based on pairwise comparisons is common, from using match outcomes to rank sports teams to using purchase or survey data to rank consumer products. Statistical inference-based methods such as the Bradley-Terry model, which extract rankings based on an underlying generative model, have emerged as flexible and powerful tools to tackle ranking in empirical data. In situations with limited and/or noisy comparisons, it is often challenging to confidently distinguish the performance of different items based on the evidence available in the data. However, most inference-based ranking methods choose to assign each item to a unique rank or score, suggesting a meaningful distinction when there is none. Here, we develop a principled nonparametric Bayesian method, adaptable to any statistical ranking method, for learning partial rankings (rankings with ties) that distinguishes among…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Criteria Decision Making
