Models for the Speiser class
Christopher J. Bishop

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between Speiser and Eremenko-Lyubich classes of transcendental entire functions, showing how models for the former can be approximated by functions in the latter and highlighting geometric differences.
Contribution
It demonstrates that Speiser class functions can approximate models of Eremenko-Lyubich functions in a weaker sense and identifies geometric restrictions unique to Speiser functions.
Findings
Models for Speiser class can be approximated by Eremenko-Lyubich functions in a weaker sense.
Stronger approximation methods for Eremenko-Lyubich functions may not apply to Speiser class functions.
Geometric restrictions are identified that distinguish Speiser class functions from general Eremenko-Lyubich functions.
Abstract
The Eremenko-Lyubich class consists of transcendental entire functions with bounded singular set and the Speiser class is made up of functions with a finite singular set. In an earlier paper "Models for the Eremenko-Lyubich class" I gave a method for constructing Eremenko-Lyubich functions that approximate certain simpler functions called models. In this paper, I show that all such models can be approximated in a weaker sense by Speiser class functions, and that the stronger approximation possible using Eemenko-Lyubich functions can fail for the Speiser class. In particular, I give geometric restrictions on the geometry of a Speiser class function that need not be satisfied by general Eremenko-Lyubich functions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHolomorphic and Operator Theory · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Analytic and geometric function theory
