Towards Explaining Uncertainty Estimates in Point Cloud Registration
Ziyuan Qin, Jongseok Lee, Rudolph Triebel

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method using kernel SHAP to explain the sources of uncertainty in probabilistic ICP point cloud registration, enhancing interpretability of robot failure modes.
Contribution
It applies explainable AI techniques to probabilistic ICP, enabling interpretation of uncertainty sources like noise and occlusion.
Findings
The explanation method reasonably identifies uncertainty sources.
It enhances interpretability of ICP failure modes.
Provides a step towards human-understandable robot diagnostics.
Abstract
Iterative Closest Point (ICP) is a commonly used algorithm to estimate transformation between two point clouds. The key idea of this work is to leverage recent advances in explainable AI for probabilistic ICP methods that provide uncertainty estimates. Concretely, we propose a method that can explain why a probabilistic ICP method produced a particular output. Our method is based on kernel SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations). With this, we assign an importance value to common sources of uncertainty in ICP such as sensor noise, occlusion, and ambiguous environments. The results of the experiment show that this explanation method can reasonably explain the uncertainty sources, providing a step towards robots that know when and why they failed in a human interpretable manner
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
MethodsShapley Additive Explanations
