Kryptonite-N: Machine Learning Strikes Back
Albus Li, Nathan Bailey, Will Sumerfield, Kira Kim

TL;DR
This paper challenges the notion that machine learning can universally approximate any function, demonstrating that with specific datasets and polynomial expansion, simple models like logistic regression can achieve universal approximation.
Contribution
It refutes the claim that machine learning cannot universally approximate functions by constructing datasets where simple models succeed with polynomial features.
Findings
Logistic regression with polynomial expansion can approximate any function on Kryptonite-N datasets.
Kryptonite-N datasets are predictably constructed to test universal approximation.
The universal approximation claim for machine learning is not absolute, given specific dataset constructions.
Abstract
Quinn et al propose challenge datasets in their work called ``Kryptonite-N". These datasets aim to counter the universal function approximation argument of machine learning, breaking the notation that machine learning can ``approximate any continuous function" \cite{original_paper}. Our work refutes this claim and shows that universal function approximations can be applied successfully; the Kryptonite datasets are constructed predictably, allowing logistic regression with sufficient polynomial expansion and L1 regularization to solve for any dimension N.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational Physics and Python Applications
MethodsL1 Regularization · Logistic Regression
