Parameter-Specific Bias Diagnostics in Random-Effects Panel Data Models
Andrew T. Karl

TL;DR
This paper introduces a parameter-specific bias diagnostic for random-effects panel data models that complements the Hausman test by providing finite-sample bias estimates and p-values for individual parameters.
Contribution
It presents a new bias diagnostic method that offers parameter-specific bias estimates and significance testing within a single random-effects model, enhancing model assessment.
Findings
The diagnostic provides finite-sample bias estimates for parameters.
Permutation-based p-values assess the significance of bias.
Application examples demonstrate practical use in panel data analysis.
Abstract
The Hausman specification test assesses the random-effects specification by comparing the random-effects estimator with a fixed-effects alternative. This note shows how a recently proposed bias diagnostic for linear mixed models can complement that test in random-effects panel-data applications. The diagnostic delivers parameter-specific internal estimates of finite-sample bias, together with permutation-based -values, from a single fitted random-effects model. We illustrate its use in a gasoline-demand panel and in a value-added model for teacher evaluation using publicly available \textsf{R} packages, and we discuss how the resulting coefficient-specific bias summaries can be incorporated into routine practice.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLabor market dynamics and wage inequality · Retirement, Disability, and Employment
