The Second Law as a constraint and admitting the approximate nature of constitutive assumptions
Amit Acharya

TL;DR
This paper presents a variational framework that treats the Second Law of thermodynamics as a constraint in continuum thermomechanics, accounting for the approximate nature of constitutive assumptions and analyzing when it acts as an over-constraint or a necessary condition.
Contribution
It introduces a novel variational principle that incorporates the Second Law as a flexible constraint, addressing the approximate nature of constitutive models in thermomechanics.
Findings
The variational principle is unconstrained and concave.
The paper discusses cases where the Second Law is an over-constraint.
The paper analyzes when the Second Law acts as a necessary constraint.
Abstract
A scheme for treating the Second Law of thermodynamics as a constraint and accounting for the approximate nature of constitutive assumptions in continuum thermomechanics is discussed. An unconstrained, concave, variational principle is designed for solving the resulting mathematical problem. Cases when the Second Law becomes an over-constraint on the mechanical model, as well as when it serves as a necessary constraint, are discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsElasticity and Material Modeling
