Trading Off Energy Storage and Payload -- An Analytical Model for Freight Train Configuration
Max T.M. Ng, Adrian Hernandez, Pablo L. Durango-Cohen, Hani S., Mahmassani

TL;DR
This paper presents an analytical model to optimize the number of energy storage tender cars in freight trains, balancing costs and operational constraints to support decarbonization efforts in rail transport.
Contribution
It introduces a convex optimization framework with a closed-form solution for determining optimal energy tender car configurations in freight trains, considering market and technology factors.
Findings
Optimal configurations vary across different freight markets.
Lighter, time-sensitive shipments use more battery tender cars.
Heavier commodities typically require fewer tender cars.
Abstract
To support planning of alternative fuel technology (e.g., battery-electric locomotives) deployment for decarbonizing non-electrified freight rail, we develop a convex optimization formulation with a closed-form solution to determine the optimal number of energy storage tender cars in a train. The formulation shares a similar structure to an Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) model. For given market characteristics, cost forecasts, and technology parameters, our model captures the trade-offs between inventory carrying costs associated with trip times (including delays due to charging/refueling) and ordering costs associated with train dispatch and operation (energy, amortized equipment, and labor costs). To illustrate the framework, we find the optimal number of battery-electric energy tender cars in 22,501 freight markets (origin-destination pairs and commodities) for U.S. Class I railroads.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
