How accurate is mechanobiology? A statistical test of cell force
Aleix Boquet-Pujadas

TL;DR
This paper highlights the lack of error quantification in cell force measurements in mechanobiology and proposes a new statistical framework to improve the reliability and hypothesis testing of these measurements.
Contribution
It introduces a general reconstruction framework for cell force measurements, addressing the absence of error estimates and enabling statistical hypothesis testing.
Findings
Identifies the absence of error bars in cell force measurements.
Proposes a statistical reconstruction framework.
Enables hypothesis testing in mechanobiology experiments.
Abstract
Mechanobiology is gaining more and more traction as the fundamental role of physical forces in biological function becomes clearer. Forces at the microscale are often measured indirectly using inverse problems such as Traction Force Microscopy because biological experiments are hard to access with physical probes. In contrast with the experimental nature of biology and physics, these measurements do not come with error bars, confidence regions, or p-values. The aim of this manuscript is to publicize this issue and to propose a first step towards a remedy therefor in the form of a general reconstruction framework. We also show that this opens the door to hypothesis testing of seemingly abstract experimental questions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMorphological variations and asymmetry · Anatomy and Medical Technology
