Editing Implicit and Explicit Representations of Radiance Fields: A Survey
Arthur Hubert, Gamal Elghazaly, Raphael Frank

TL;DR
This survey reviews recent advances in editing neural radiance fields, categorizing methods, and discussing new applications, highlighting the gap between NeRF development and editing techniques.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive taxonomy and comparison of existing radiance field editing methods, and discusses future directions and applications.
Findings
Classified editing methods into a new taxonomy.
Compared state-of-the-art approaches in editing options and performance.
Identified opportunities for future research and applications.
Abstract
Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) revolutionized novel view synthesis in recent years by offering a new volumetric representation, which is compact and provides high-quality image rendering. However, the methods to edit those radiance fields developed slower than the many improvements to other aspects of NeRF. With the recent development of alternative radiance field-based representations inspired by NeRF as well as the worldwide rise in popularity of text-to-image models, many new opportunities and strategies have emerged to provide radiance field editing. In this paper, we deliver a comprehensive survey of the different editing methods present in the literature for NeRF and other similar radiance field representations. We propose a new taxonomy for classifying existing works based on their editing methodologies, review pioneering models, reflect on current and potential new applications…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques · Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques · 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
