Comparison of Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Eye Movements in Non-experts and the Skill Transfer Effects of Gaze Guidance and Annotation Guidance
Shota Nishijima, Asuka Takai

TL;DR
This study compares gaze and annotation guidance methods in teaching karate kata evaluation, revealing that gaze guidance can improve skill transfer and peripheral vision, with implications for various fields.
Contribution
It provides the first direct comparison of gaze-based and annotation-based guidance effects on eye movements and skill transfer in karate kata evaluation.
Findings
Annotation guidance directs gaze to focus areas.
Gaze guidance promotes peripheral vision.
71.4% of gaze-guided participants improved in ranking.
Abstract
Methods for converting the tacit knowledge of experts into explicit knowledge have drawn increasing attention. Gaze data has emerged as a valuable approach in this effort. However, the effective transfer of tacit knowledge remains a challenge. No studies have directly compared the effects of gaze-based and annotation-based guidance or adequately examined their impacts on skill improvement after instruction. This study examined the effects of gaze and annotation guidance on the spatiotemporal characteristics of eye movements and the skill transfer of expert evaluation techniques in karate kata performances. 28 non-expert participants were assigned to three groups: a gaze guidance group, an annotation guidance group, and a control group. Participants were presented with instructional slideshows based on the expert's gaze data and annotations. Before and after instruction, participants…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpatial Cognition and Navigation
