Evaluation of radiomic feature harmonization techniques for benign and malignant pulmonary nodules
Claire Huchthausen, Menglin Shi, Gabriel L.A. de Sousa, Jonathan, Colen, Emery Shelley, James Larner, Einsley Janowski, Krishni Wijesooriya

TL;DR
This study evaluates different radiomic feature harmonization techniques for pulmonary nodules, demonstrating that separate or covariate-based harmonization better preserves diagnostic information across benign and malignant cases.
Contribution
It introduces and compares harmonization methods that account for differences between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules, improving feature stability and diagnostic performance.
Findings
Separate harmonization yields 90.9% acquisition-independent features.
Harmonization with a covariate improves feature independence to 27.3%.
Separate or covariate-based harmonization enhances malignancy prediction accuracy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Radiomics provides quantitative features of pulmonary nodules (PNs) which could aid lung cancer diagnosis, but medical image acquisition variability is an obstacle to clinical application. Acquisition effects may differ between radiomic features from benign vs. malignant PNs. PURPOSE: We evaluated how to account for differences between benign and malignant PNs when correcting radiomic features' acquisition dependency. METHODS: We used 567 chest CT scans grouped as benign, malignant, or lung cancer screening (mixed benign, malignant). ComBat harmonization was applied to extracted features for variation in 4 acquisition parameters. We compared: harmonizing without distinction, harmonizing with a covariate to preserve distinctions between subgroups, and harmonizing subgroups separately. Significant () Kruskal-Wallis tests showed whether harmonization removed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
