Easy better quantum process tomography
Robin Blume-Kohout, Kenneth Rudinger, and Timothy Proctor

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method to improve quantum process tomography by incorporating SPAM calibration data, reducing bias and gauge freedom, and providing explicit correction procedures for linear-inversion techniques.
Contribution
It presents a novel correction procedure for standard and overcomplete linear-inversion QPT that leverages SPAM calibration data to enhance accuracy.
Findings
Reduces bias in quantum process estimates
Provides explicit correction procedures for linear-inversion QPT
Extends correction methods to maximum likelihood estimators
Abstract
Quantum process tomography (QPT), used to estimate the linear map that best describes a quantum operation, is usually performed using a priori assumptions about state preparation and measurement (SPAM), which yield a biased and inconsistent estimator. This estimate can be made more accurate and less biased by incorporating SPAM-calibration data. Unobservable properties of the SPAM operations introduce a small gauge freedom that can be regularized using the a priori SPAM. We give an explicit correction procedure for standard linear-inversion QPT and overcomplete linear-inversion QPT, and describe how to extend it to statistically principled estimators like maximum likelihood estimation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
