Is AI Robust Enough for Scientific Research?
Jun-Jie Zhang, Jiahao Song, Xiu-Cheng Wang, Fu-Peng Li, Zehan Liu,, Jian-Nan Chen, Haoning Dang, Shiyao Wang, Yiyan Zhang, Jianhui Xu, Chunxiang, Shi, Fei Wang, Long-Gang Pang, Nan Cheng, Weiwei Zhang, Duo Zhang, Deyu Meng

TL;DR
This paper reveals that neural networks used in scientific research are highly vulnerable to small perturbations, posing risks to their reliability across diverse scientific applications.
Contribution
It uncovers a broad, general vulnerability of neural networks to minute perturbations in scientific applications, highlighting a critical reliability concern.
Findings
Neural networks are highly susceptible to small input perturbations.
Vulnerability observed across five diverse scientific domains.
Raises concerns about the reliability of AI in scientific research.
Abstract
We uncover a phenomenon largely overlooked by the scientific community utilizing AI: neural networks exhibit high susceptibility to minute perturbations, resulting in significant deviations in their outputs. Through an analysis of five diverse application areas -- weather forecasting, chemical energy and force calculations, fluid dynamics, quantum chromodynamics, and wireless communication -- we demonstrate that this vulnerability is a broad and general characteristic of AI systems. This revelation exposes a hidden risk in relying on neural networks for essential scientific computations, calling further studies on their reliability and security.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
