Discriminating between different modified dispersion relations from gamma-ray observations
S. Caroff, C. Pfeifer, J. Bolmont, T. Terzi\'c, A. Campoy-Ordaz, D., Kerszberg, M. Martinez, U. Pensec, C. Plard, J. Stri\v{s}kovi\'c, S. Wong

TL;DR
This paper introduces a general parameterization for modified photon dispersion relations affecting gamma-ray observations, enabling comparison and testing of different models against simulated data to identify potential quantum spacetime effects.
Contribution
It develops a unified parameterized model for photon dispersion relations, allowing direct comparison of various theoretical models with observational data.
Findings
Different models yield distinct bounds on the energy scale Λ.
Injected signals at the Planck scale are detectable across models.
Discrimination between models improves with a wide redshift source distribution.
Abstract
The fact that the standard dispersion relation for photons in vacuum could be modified because of their interaction with the quantum nature of spacetime has been proposed more than two decades ago. A quantitative model [Jacob \& Piran, JCAP 01, 031 (2008)], has been tested extensively using distant highly energetic astrophysical sources, searching for energy-dependent time delays in photon arrival times. Since no delay was firmly measured, lower limits were set on the energy scale related to these effects. In recent years, however, different but equally well-grounded expressions beyond the Jacob \& Piran model were obtained for the photon dispersion relation, leading to different expressions for the dependence of lag versus redshift. This article introduces a general parameterization of modified dispersion relations in cosmological symmetry, which directly leads to a general…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
