The geometric nature of homeostatic stress in biological growth
Alexander Erlich, Giuseppe Zurlo

TL;DR
This paper introduces a geometric framework for understanding homeostatic stress in biological growth, focusing on growth incompatibility as a measure of tissue frustration, linking cellular regulation to tissue-level mechanics.
Contribution
It shifts the focus from traditional homeostatic stress to growth incompatibility, proposing a physically grounded model inspired by General Relativity to regulate tissue size and shape.
Findings
Incompatibility measured by Ricci tensor relates to residual stresses.
A new formulation penalizes deviations from desired incompatibility.
Framework links cellular regulation with tissue-scale mechanics.
Abstract
Morphogenesis, the process of growth and shape formation in biological tissues, is driven by complex interactions between mechanical, biochemical, and genetic factors. Traditional models of biological growth often rely on the concept of homeostatic Eshelby stress, which defines an ideal target state for the growing body. Any local deviation from this state triggers growth and remodelling, aimed at restoring balance between mechanical forces and biological adaptation. Despite its relevance in the biomechanical context, the nature of homeostatic stress remains elusive, with its value and spatial distribution often chosen arbitrarily, lacking a clear biological interpretation or understanding of its connection to the lower scales of the tissue. To bring clarity on the nature of homeostatic stress, we shift the focus from Eshelby stress to growth incompatibility, a measure of geometric…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCellular Mechanics and Interactions
