Making Transparency Advocates: An Educational Approach Towards Better Algorithmic Transparency in Practice
Andrew Bell, Julia Stoyanovich

TL;DR
This paper presents an educational approach to cultivate transparency advocates within organizations through workshops, aiming to bridge the gap between XAI research and practical implementation of algorithmic transparency.
Contribution
It introduces a novel, open-source educational workshop designed to foster algorithmic transparency advocacy among professionals across different domains.
Findings
Participants improved their transparency literacy.
Participants applied advocacy skills in organizational meetings.
Advocacy willingness varies by professional field.
Abstract
Concerns about the risks and harms posed by artificial intelligence (AI) have resulted in significant study into algorithmic transparency, giving rise to a sub-field known as Explainable AI (XAI). Unfortunately, despite a decade of development in XAI, an existential challenge remains: progress in research has not been fully translated into the actual implementation of algorithmic transparency by organizations. In this work, we test an approach for addressing the challenge by creating transparency advocates, or motivated individuals within organizations who drive a ground-up cultural shift towards improved algorithmic transparency. Over several years, we created an open-source educational workshop on algorithmic transparency and advocacy. We delivered the workshop to professionals across two separate domains to improve their algorithmic transparency literacy and willingness to advocate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Big Data and Business Intelligence · Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
