The Reliability Paradox: Exploring How Shortcut Learning Undermines Language Model Calibration
Geetanjali Bihani, Julia Rayz

TL;DR
This paper investigates how shortcut learning in pre-trained language models can lead to miscalibration, revealing that better calibration does not necessarily equate to more reliable and generalizable decision-making.
Contribution
It uncovers the paradoxical relationship between calibration error and shortcut learning, challenging assumptions about model reliability based on calibration metrics.
Findings
Models with better calibration often rely on non-generalizable shortcuts.
Lower calibration error does not guarantee more reliable predictions.
The study emphasizes the need for calibration methods that account for decision rule robustness.
Abstract
The advent of pre-trained language models (PLMs) has enabled significant performance gains in the field of natural language processing. However, recent studies have found PLMs to suffer from miscalibration, indicating a lack of accuracy in the confidence estimates provided by these models. Current evaluation methods for PLM calibration often assume that lower calibration error estimates indicate more reliable predictions. However, fine-tuned PLMs often resort to shortcuts, leading to overconfident predictions that create the illusion of enhanced performance but lack generalizability in their decision rules. The relationship between PLM reliability, as measured by calibration error, and shortcut learning, has not been thoroughly explored thus far. This paper aims to investigate this relationship, studying whether lower calibration error implies reliable decision rules for a language…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques
