Streamlining Systematic Reviews: A Novel Application of Large Language Models
Fouad Trad, Ryan Yammine, Jana Charafeddine, Marlene Chakhtoura, Maya Rahme, Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan, Ali Chehab

TL;DR
This paper presents an innovative LLM-based system that automates literature screening in systematic reviews, significantly reducing manual effort and outperforming existing tools in accuracy and efficiency.
Contribution
The study introduces a novel LLM application for both title/abstract and full-text screening, achieving high accuracy and drastically reducing manual review time.
Findings
Achieved 99.5% article exclusion rate with 0% false negatives.
Reduced manual screening time by 95.5%.
Outperformed Rayyan in accuracy and efficiency.
Abstract
Systematic reviews (SRs) are essential for evidence-based guidelines but are often limited by the time-consuming nature of literature screening. We propose and evaluate an in-house system based on Large Language Models (LLMs) for automating both title/abstract and full-text screening, addressing a critical gap in the literature. Using a completed SR on Vitamin D and falls (14,439 articles), the LLM-based system employed prompt engineering for title/abstract screening and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for full-text screening. The system achieved an article exclusion rate (AER) of 99.5%, specificity of 99.6%, a false negative rate (FNR) of 0%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. After screening, only 78 articles required manual review, including all 20 identified by traditional methods, reducing manual screening time by 95.5%. For comparison, Rayyan, a commercial tool…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational and Text Analysis Methods
