Robust modestly weighted log-rank tests
Dominic Magirr, Fredrik \"Ohrn

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new robust log-rank test that combines existing weighted tests to improve power and reliability in survival analysis, especially for immuno-oncology trials with non-proportional hazards.
Contribution
A novel test statistic that integrates standard, modestly weighted, and MaxCombo log-rank tests to enhance robustness and power across various survival scenarios.
Findings
The new test maintains high power in delayed effect scenarios.
It reduces the risk of counterintuitive results with crossing hazards.
Simulation studies confirm its robustness and efficiency.
Abstract
The introduction of checkpoint inhibitors in immuno-oncology has raised questions about the suitability of the log-rank test as the default primary analysis method in confirmatory studies, particularly when survival curves exhibit non-proportional hazards. The log-rank test, while effective in controlling false positive rates, may lose power in scenarios where survival curves remain similar for extended periods before diverging. To address this, various weighted versions of the log-rank test have been proposed, including the MaxCombo test, which combines multiple weighted log-rank statistics to enhance power across a range of alternative hypotheses. Despite its potential, the MaxCombo test has seen limited adoption, possibly owing to its proneness to produce counterintuitive results in situations where the hazard functions on the two arms cross. In response, the modestly weighted…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRisk and Portfolio Optimization · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Multi-Criteria Decision Making
