Multimodal Hypothetical Summary for Retrieval-based Multi-image Question Answering

TL;DR

This paper introduces MHyS, a multimodal hypothetical summary approach that enhances retrieval-based multi-image question answering by transforming images into text summaries, improving retrieval accuracy and overall QA performance.

Contribution

The paper presents a novel multimodal summarization method that replaces real images with text summaries, reducing modality gaps and improving retrieval in multi-image QA tasks.

Findings

Achieved 3.7% absolute improvement on RETVQA

Improved retrieval accuracy by transforming images into text summaries

Demonstrated effectiveness through comprehensive experiments and ablations

Abstract

Retrieval-based multi-image question answering (QA) task involves retrieving multiple question-related images and synthesizing these images to generate an answer. Conventional "retrieve-then-answer" pipelines often suffer from cascading errors because the training objective of QA fails to optimize the retrieval stage. To address this issue, we propose a novel method to effectively introduce and reference retrieved information into the QA. Given the image set to be retrieved, we employ a multimodal large language model (visual perspective) and a large language model (textual perspective) to obtain multimodal hypothetical summary in question-form and description-form. By combining visual and textual perspectives, MHyS captures image content more specifically and replaces real images in retrieval, which eliminates the modality gap by transforming into text-to-text retrieval and helps improve retrieval. To more advantageously introduce retrieval with QA, we employ contrastive learning to align queries (questions) with MHyS. Moreover, we propose a coarse-to-fine strategy for calculating both sentence-level and word-level similarity scores, to further enhance retrieval and filter out irrelevant details. Our approach achieves a 3.7% absolute improvement over state-of-the-art methods on RETVQA and a 14.5% improvement over CLIP. Comprehensive experiments and detailed ablation studies demonstrate the superiority of our method.