Mediation Analysis for Probabilities of Causation
Yuta Kawakami, Jin Tian

TL;DR
This paper introduces new variants of probabilities of causation that quantify the necessity and sufficiency of treatments, providing identification theorems and demonstrating their application on real data.
Contribution
It presents novel PoC measures for different causal pathways, along with identification theorems enabling their estimation from observational data.
Findings
New PoC variants for direct and indirect effects
Identification theorems for observational data
Application to real-world psychology dataset
Abstract
Probabilities of causation (PoC) offer valuable insights for informed decision-making. This paper introduces novel variants of PoC-controlled direct, natural direct, and natural indirect probability of necessity and sufficiency (PNS). These metrics quantify the necessity and sufficiency of a treatment for producing an outcome, accounting for different causal pathways. We develop identification theorems for these new PoC measures, allowing for their estimation from observational data. We demonstrate the practical application of our results through an analysis of a real-world psychology dataset.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsDispute Resolution and Class Actions
