Towards Provable Security in Industrial Control Systems Via Dynamic Protocol Attestation
Arthur Amorim, Trevor Kann, Max Taylor, Lance Joneckis

TL;DR
This paper presents a formal, machine-checked protocol attestation method to enhance the security of industrial control systems against cyber attacks, ensuring safety properties even under adversarial conditions.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach combining formal methods, domain-specific language, and dynamic attestation to enforce safe actions in ICS protocols, preventing cyber attacks.
Findings
Effective protocol enforcement demonstrated on Fischertechnik platform
Dynamic attestation maintains safety with acceptable latency and throughput
Formal proofs ensure protocol safety properties
Abstract
Industrial control systems (ICSs) increasingly rely on digital technologies vulnerable to cyber attacks. Cyber attackers can infiltrate ICSs and execute malicious actions. Individually, each action seems innocuous. But taken together, they cause the system to enter an unsafe state. These attacks have resulted in dramatic consequences such as physical damage, economic loss, and environmental catastrophes. This paper introduces a methodology that restricts actions using protocols. These protocols only allow safe actions to execute. Protocols are written in a domain specific language we have embedded in an interactive theorem prover (ITP). The ITP enables formal, machine-checked proofs to ensure protocols maintain safety properties. We use dynamic attestation to ensure ICSs conform to their protocol even if an adversary compromises a component. Since protocol conformance prevents unsafe…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
