A Unifying Information-theoretic Perspective on Evaluating Generative Models
Alexis Fox, Samarth Swarup, Abhijin Adiga

TL;DR
This paper introduces a unifying information-theoretic framework for evaluating generative models, proposing a new tri-dimensional metric that separately measures fidelity and diversity, and analyzing existing metrics' limitations.
Contribution
It unifies existing kNN-based metrics under an information-theoretic perspective and introduces a novel three-component metric for comprehensive evaluation of generative models.
Findings
The proposed metric effectively distinguishes between different qualities of generative models.
It reveals limitations and undesirable behaviors of existing evaluation metrics.
Experimental results demonstrate the sensitivity and domain-agnostic nature of the new metric.
Abstract
Considering the difficulty of interpreting generative model output, there is significant current research focused on determining meaningful evaluation metrics. Several recent approaches utilize "precision" and "recall," borrowed from the classification domain, to individually quantify the output fidelity (realism) and output diversity (representation of the real data variation), respectively. With the increase in metric proposals, there is a need for a unifying perspective, allowing for easier comparison and clearer explanation of their benefits and drawbacks. To this end, we unify a class of kth-nearest-neighbors (kNN)-based metrics under an information-theoretic lens using approaches from kNN density estimation. Additionally, we propose a tri-dimensional metric composed of Precision Cross-Entropy (PCE), Recall Cross-Entropy (RCE), and Recall Entropy (RE), which separately measure…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Complex Systems and Decision Making
