The Mira discovery problem -- Observations by David Fabricius in 1596 and 1609 (and by others before?): Positional accuracy, brightness, color index, and period
R. Neuh\"auser (U Jena), D.L. Neuh\"auser (indep. scholar), M., Mugrauer, D. Luge (U Jena), J. Chapman (UC Berkeley)

TL;DR
This paper reviews historical observations of Mira by Fabricius and others, analyzing positional accuracy, brightness, color index, and period, revealing insights into early variable star detection and measurement accuracy over centuries.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of Fabricius's 1596 and 1609 observations of Mira, including brightness, color, and period, contextualized within historical and observational biases.
Findings
Fabricius measured Mira's position with b1 1.6-1.7' accuracy.
Mira's brightness around 1.9 mag and color index b1 1.3-1.4 mag in 1596.
The Mira period is consistent at 330.2 days over centuries, with no evidence of secular shifts.
Abstract
The pulsating variable star Mira (omikron Ceti) was observed by David Fabricius (Frisia) in 1596 and 1609. We review suggested previous detections (e.g. China, Hipparchos). We analyze all Mira records from Fabricius in their historical context. Fabricius measured the separation of Mira to other stars to \pm 1.6-1.7'. From his texts, we derive a brightness (slightly brighter than Hamal) of ca. 1.9 \pm 0.1 mag and a color index B-V \simeq 1.3-1.4 mag (`like Mars') for 1596 Aug 3 (jul.). Mira started to fainten 19 days later and was observed until mid/late Oct. We show why such a red star cannot be followed by the naked eye until ca. 6 mag: For Mira's color at disappearance and altitude from Frisia, the limit is reduced by ca. 1.0 mag. Since Fabricius connected the Mira brightening with the close-by prograde Jupiter, he re-detected it only 12 years later, probably shortly before a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
