Models for the common knowledge logic
Yoshihito Tanaka

TL;DR
This paper explores models of common knowledge logic, demonstrating that CKL-frames are definable by modal logic, but CKL-algebras are not, highlighting differences in their algebraic and frame-theoretic properties.
Contribution
It establishes that CKL-frames are modally definable while CKL-algebras are not, revealing fundamental distinctions in their logical and algebraic structures.
Findings
CKL-frames are modally definable.
CKL-algebras are not a variety.
Existence of modal algebra validating the logic without CKL-algebra properties.
Abstract
In this paper, we discuss models of the common knowledge logic. The common knowledge logic is a multi-modal logic that includes the modal operators (, where is a finite set of agents) and in the language. The intended meanings of () and are ''the agent knows '' () and '' is common knowledge among '', respectively. Semantically, this can be expressed as follows: is true if and only if all of , , , are true, where . A Kripke frame that satisfies the condition is , where is the reflexive and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies
