Assessing fault-tolerant quantum advantage for $k$-SAT with structure
Martijn Brehm, Jordi Weggemans

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the practical potential of quantum algorithms for structured $k$-SAT problems, revealing that quantum speedups are limited in realistic scenarios due to overheads and problem structure.
Contribution
It applies hybrid benchmarking to assess quantum backtracking and Grover's algorithms on structured $k$-SAT, providing realistic estimates of quantum advantage considering error correction and problem structure.
Findings
Quantum speedups vanish with minimal structure or when using T-count.
Only Grover's algorithm shows limited potential for speedup within a day.
Structured heuristics might restore quantum advantage, but practical benefits remain constrained.
Abstract
For many problems, quantum algorithms promise speedups over their classical counterparts. However, these results predominantly rely on asymptotic worst-case analysis, which overlooks significant overheads due to error correction and the fact that real-world instances often contain exploitable structure. In this work, we employ the hybrid benchmarking method to evaluate the potential of quantum Backtracking and Grover's algorithm against the 2023 SAT competition main track winner in solving random -SAT instances with tunable structure, designed to represent industry-like scenarios, using both -depth and -count as cost metrics to estimate quantum run times. Our findings reproduce the results of Campbell, Khurana, and Montanaro (Quantum '19) in the unstructured case using hybrid benchmarking. However, we offer a more sobering perspective in practically relevant regimes: almost all…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
