Comments on "Fundamental nature of the self-field critical current in superconductors", arxiv:2409.16758
Amit Goyal, Rohit Kumar, Armando Galluzzi, Massimiliano Polichetti

TL;DR
This paper critiques previous claims about a universal self-field critical current in superconductors, providing experimental evidence that challenges the validity of those claims and the associated theoretical framework.
Contribution
It offers a critical analysis demonstrating that the proposed universal self-field critical current and fundamental limit are experimentally invalid, refuting prior theoretical assertions.
Findings
Experimental evidence contradicts the universal self-field critical current claim.
The proposed fundamental limit for self-field Jc is proven incorrect.
The critique invalidates key claims in the referenced articles.
Abstract
We provide comments on article "Fundamental nature of the self-field critical current in superconductors" by Talantsev and Tallon, arXiv:2409.16758 and https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4978589 related to the predictions of the key equation proposed in article "Universal self-field critical current for thin-film superconductors," by Talantsev and Tallon, Nat. Commun. 6 (2015) 7820. We respond to claims and assertions made in these articles and also show that the so-called "Universal self-field critical current" and the "fundamental limit" for self-field Jc suggested by Talantsev and Tallon, has been proven incorrect experimentally and this invalidates the key claims and findings stated in both these articles.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Superconducting Materials and Applications
