Higgs Factory options for CERN: A comparative study
Alain Blondel, Christophe Grojean, Patrick Janot, Guy Wilkinson

TL;DR
This study compares future e+e- Higgs factories, concluding that FCC-ee offers superior precision, sustainability, and broader experimental potential compared to linear colliders like CLIC and ILC@CERN, making it the best choice for CERN.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of FCC, CLIC, and ILC@CERN, highlighting FCC-ee's advantages in precision, sustainability, and experimental scope.
Findings
FCC-ee achieves Higgs measurement precision in 8 years that linear colliders need 50 years for.
FCC-ee has significantly lower electricity consumption, cost, and carbon footprint.
FCC-ee enables a broader experimental program than linear colliders.
Abstract
``All future Higgs factories have similar reach for the precise measurement of the Higgs boson properties.'': this popular statement has often led to the impression that all options are scientifically equivalent when it comes to choosing the future post-LHC collider at CERN. More recently, the concept of sustainability has been added in attempts to rank Higgs factories. A comparative analysis of the data currently available is performed in this note to clarify these issues for three different options: the future circular colliders (FCC), and two linear collider alternatives (CLIC and ILC@CERN). The main observation is as follows. For the precise measurement of already demonstrated Higgs decays (b\=b, , gg, ZZ, WW) and for , it would take half a century to CLIC and ILC@CERN to reach the precisions that FCC-ee can achieve in 8 years…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
