Multiplexing in Networks and Diffusion
Arun G. Chandrasekhar, Vasu Chaudhary, Benjamin Golub, and Matthew O. Jackson

TL;DR
This paper studies how multiplexed social networks influence the spread of contagions, showing that multiplexing can both hinder simple contagions and enhance complex ones, with empirical evidence from Indian villages.
Contribution
It introduces a theoretical model of diffusion in multiplex networks and provides empirical analysis of multiplexing patterns and their effects on information spread.
Findings
Multiplexing impedes simple contagion spread.
Multiplexing enhances complex contagion at low infection rates.
Greater multiplexing overlap reduces overall diffusion.
Abstract
Social and economic networks are often multiplexed, meaning that people are connected by different types of relationships -- such as borrowing goods and giving advice. We make two contributions to the study of multiplexing and the understanding of simple versus complex contagion. On the theoretical side, we introduce a model and theoretical results about diffusion in multiplex networks. We show that multiplexing impedes the spread of simple contagions, such as diseases or basic information that only require one interaction to transmit an infection. We show, however that multiplexing enhances the spread of a complex contagion when infection rates are low, but then impedes complex contagion if infection rates become high. On the empirical side, we document empirical multiplexing patterns in Indian village data. We show that relationships such as socializing, advising, helping, and lending…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Network Analysis Techniques
MethodsDiffusion
