Combined analysis of the 12.8 and 15 $\mu m$ JWST/MIRI eclipse observations of TRAPPIST-1 b
Elsa Ducrot, Pierre-Olivier Lagage, Michiel Min, Michael Gillon,, Taylor J. Bell, Pascal Tremblin, Thomas Greene, Achrene Dyrek, Jeroen, Bouwman, Rens Waters, Manuel Gudel, Thomas Henning, Bart Vandenbussche,, Olivier Absil, David Barrado, Anthony Boccaletti, Alain Coulais

TL;DR
This study analyzes JWST/MIRI eclipse data of TRAPPIST-1 b at 12.8 and 15 micrometers, exploring whether the planet is a bare rock or has a thick CO2 atmosphere, revealing two plausible scenarios.
Contribution
It combines new multi-band JWST/MIRI eclipse observations with a global analysis to constrain TRAPPIST-1 b's surface and atmospheric properties, highlighting the complexity of interpretation.
Findings
Detection of thermal emission at 15 μm and 12.8 μm.
Two main models fit the data: a bare rock or a thick CO2 atmosphere.
Challenges in distinguishing surface vs. atmospheric features from broadband data.
Abstract
The first JWST/MIRI photometric observations of TRAPPIST-1 b allowed for the detection of the thermal emission of the planet at 15 , suggesting that the planet could be a bare rock with a zero albedo and no redistribution of heat. These observations at 15 were acquired as part of GTO time that included a twin program at 12.8 in order to have a measurement in and outside the CO absorption band. Here we present five new occultations of TRAPPIST-1 b observed with MIRI in an additional photometric band at 12.8 . We perform a global fit of the 10 eclipses and derive a planet-to-star flux ratio and 1- error of 452 86 ppm and 775 90 ppm at 12.8 and 15 , respectively. We find that two main scenarios emerge. An airless planet model with an unweathered (fresh) ultramafic surface, that could be indicative of relatively recent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
