Deep Random Features for Scalable Interpolation of Spatiotemporal Data
Weibin Chen, Azhir Mahmood, Michel Tsamados, So Takao

TL;DR
This paper introduces a scalable deep learning approach using random features to interpolate complex spatiotemporal data from remote sensing, overcoming Gaussian process limitations.
Contribution
It proposes a Bayesian deep learning method with random feature expansions to efficiently model non-stationary, high-frequency patterns in large-scale spatiotemporal data.
Findings
Achieves competitive or superior interpolation accuracy.
Produces well-calibrated uncertainty estimates.
Handles large-scale remote sensing datasets effectively.
Abstract
The rapid growth of earth observation systems calls for a scalable approach to interpolate remote-sensing observations. These methods in principle, should acquire more information about the observed field as data grows. Gaussian processes (GPs) are candidate model choices for interpolation. However, due to their poor scalability, they usually rely on inducing points for inference, which restricts their expressivity. Moreover, commonly imposed assumptions such as stationarity prevents them from capturing complex patterns in the data. While deep GPs can overcome this issue, training and making inference with them are difficult, again requiring crude approximations via inducing points. In this work, we instead approach the problem through Bayesian deep learning, where spatiotemporal fields are represented by deep neural networks, whose layers share the inductive bias of stationary GPs on…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Poster
- The paper integrates multiple uncertainty quantification techniques (variational inference, dropout, deep ensembles), offering flexibility in obtaining uncertainty estimates for the model outputs. - The architecture performs well across varied datasets, including synthetic, local, and global satellite measurements, and the spherical adaptation for global data fields demonstrates its versatility.
I don’t see any major concerns or weaknesses in this paper, but I believe it would benefit from some ablation studies, which are currently missing, to better illustrate the contributions of the proposed model. Please refer to the questions for details.
- The paper addresses a clear and timely topic, focusing on coordinate-based neural representation for sparse observations. - Figures 1 and 2 effectively illustrate both the task and the model structure. - The theoretical background on random features is covered in sufficient depth.
- The model does not appear to outperform baselines in terms of accuracy or computation time. - Although the primary contribution is the application of random features, the paper does not cover advanced Fourier, Wavelet features, such as [1]. It would be helpful for the authors to consider incorporating these features or at least to discuss how their approach might be extended to include them. - The assumption of stationary kernel seems limit model performance, and further clarification on thi
• The authors present the methodology clearly, supplemented by informative visualizations, and provide a comprehensive discussion of the experimental results. • The proposed framework integrates the flexibility of NNs with the inductive bias of GPs, offering a scalable solution for large datasets. • Detecting high-frequency patterns is important in environmental data analysis, as such patterns are often closely associated with extreme events. • While there exists some amount of literature on
• For clarity, it would be better to differentiate $H$ from $B$ in Section 3.1, as $H$ plays a similar role as $M$ in Section 2.2 which represents the dimension of the random features, while the bottleneck dimension $B$ is analogous to the hidden layer dimension in NNs. • A more comprehensive discussion of related work would enhance the paper’s contribution. For instance, [1] investigated representation learning through the approximation of kernels using random Fourier features. Additionally, [
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques · Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications · Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
MethodsGreedy Policy Search
