TL;DR
This paper provides a comprehensive survey of Action Quality Assessment, introducing a taxonomy, establishing a unified benchmark, and analyzing trends, challenges, and future directions in the field.
Contribution
It proposes a hierarchical taxonomy for AQA methods, creates a unified benchmark with standardized evaluation protocols, and offers an analysis of research trends and future opportunities.
Findings
Organized existing AQA methods into video-based, skeleton-based, and multi-modal categories.
Established a unified benchmark for consistent comparison of AQA methods.
Analyzed emerging trends, challenges, and future directions in AQA research.
Abstract
Action Quality Assessment (AQA) aims to automatically evaluate how well human actions are performed and has been widely applied in sports analysis, skill assessment, and healthcare. However, AQA studies are often developed under heterogeneous datasets and evaluation settings, making systematic comparison across methods difficult. To address these challenges, we present a comprehensive survey of recent advances in AQA. In particular, we propose a modality-driven hierarchical taxonomy that organizes existing methods into video-based, skeleton-based, and multi-modal approaches, and analyze the methodological evolution of representative models. We further establish a unified benchmark for representative video-based AQA methods by integrating diverse datasets and standardized evaluation protocols, enabling consistent comparison in terms of both accuracy and computational efficiency. Finally,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHuman Pose and Action Recognition · Action Observation and Synchronization · Emotion and Mood Recognition
