A Trust-Centric Approach To Quantifying Maturity and Security in Internet Voting Protocols
Stanis{\l}aw Bara\'nski, Ben Biedermann, Joshua Ellul

TL;DR
This paper introduces a trust-centric maturity scoring framework for internet voting protocols, enabling comprehensive evaluation of security, trust assumptions, and usability to aid decision-makers in selecting suitable systems.
Contribution
It proposes the Internet Voting Maturity Framework (IVMF), a novel, extendable toolkit for assessing and comparing internet voting systems based on security and socio-technical factors.
Findings
Evaluated 17 internet voting systems using the IVMF
Identified key trust and security gaps in existing protocols
Provided a standardized assessment approach for decision-makers
Abstract
Voting is a cornerstone of collective participatory decision-making in contexts ranging from political elections to decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs). Despite the proliferation of internet voting protocols promising enhanced accessibility and efficiency, their evaluation and comparison are complicated by a lack of standardized criteria and unified definitions of security and maturity. Furthermore, socio-technical requirements by decision makers are not structurally taken into consideration when comparing internet voting systems. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a trust-centric maturity scoring framework to quantify the security and maturity of seventeen internet voting systems. A comprehensive trust model analysis is conducted for selected internet voting protocols, examining their security properties, trust assumptions, technical complexity, and practical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
