Is your stochastic signal really detectable?
Federico Pozzoli, Jonathan Gair, Riccardo Buscicchio, Lorenzo Speri

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian framework for detecting stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds that accounts for uncertainties in both the signal and noise, improving robustness over existing methods.
Contribution
It presents a formalism to compute the averaged Bayes factor considering instrumental noise and SGWB uncertainties, offering a more reliable detection criterion.
Findings
Developed a Bayesian sensitivity curve for LISA SGWB detection.
Incorporated uncertainties in both signal and noise into the detection formalism.
Provided a more realistic detection threshold compared to traditional methods.
Abstract
Separating a stochastic gravitational wave background (SGWB) from noise is a challenging statistical task. One approach to establishing a detection criterion for the SGWB is using Bayesian evidence. If the evidence ratio (Bayes factor) between models with and without the signal exceeds a certain threshold, the signal is considered detected. We present a formalism to compute the averaged Bayes factor, incorporating instrumental-noise and SGWB uncertainties. As an example, we consider the case of power-law-shaped SGWB in LISA and generate the corresponding Bayesian sensitivity curve. Unlike existing methods in the literature, which typically neglect uncertainties in both the signal and noise, our approach provides a reliable and realistic alternative. This flexible framework opens avenues for more robust stochastic gravitational wave background detection across gravitational-wave…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
