Low-Energy Nuclear Recoil Calibration of XENONnT with a $^{88}$YBe Photoneutron Source
XENON Collaboration: E. Aprile, J. Aalbers, K. Abe, S. Ahmed Maouloud, L. Althueser, B. Andrieu, E. Angelino, D. Ant\'on Martin, F. Arneodo, L. Baudis, M. Bazyk, L. Bellagamba, R. Biondi, A. Bismark, K. Boese, A. Brown, G. Bruno, R. Budnik, C. Cai, C. Capelli, J. M. R. Cardoso

TL;DR
This paper reports the first calibration of XENONnT's light and charge yields for low-energy nuclear recoils using a Yttrium-Beryllium photoneutron source, enhancing dark matter and neutrino detection sensitivity.
Contribution
It introduces a novel calibration method for XENONnT using a 152 keV neutron source, improving low-energy recoil measurements for dark matter and neutrino research.
Findings
Accumulated 474 events over 183 hours with the source.
Estimated background of 55 ± 12 accidental events.
Determined light and charge yields between 0.3-5.0 keV$_{NR}$ at 23 V/cm.
Abstract
Characterizing low-energy, keV-range nuclear recoils near the detector threshold is one of the major challenges for large direct dark matter detectors. To that end, we have successfully used a Yttrium-Beryllium photoneutron source that emits 152 keV neutrons for the calibration of the light and charge yields of the XENONnT experiment for the first time. After data selection, we accumulated 474 events from 183 hours of exposure with this source. The expected background was accidental coincidence events, estimated using a dedicated 152 hour background calibration run with a Yttrium-PVC gamma-only source and data-driven modeling. From these calibrations, we extracted the light (charge) yield for liquid xenon at our field strength of 23 V/cm between 0.3 (0.7) keV and 5.0 keV. This calibration is crucial for accurately measuring the solar B neutrino…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
