Evaluation of quantum key distribution systems against injection-locking attacks
Jerome Wiesemann, Fadri Gr\"unenfelder, Ana Bl\'azquez, Nino Walenta, Davide Rusca

TL;DR
This paper experimentally characterizes how injection-locking attacks can de-randomize the phase in practical quantum key distribution systems, highlighting the importance of isolation to ensure security.
Contribution
It introduces a source-agnostic experimental method to quantify phase de-randomization caused by injection locking in QKD systems.
Findings
Injection locking can significantly reduce phase randomness in QKD sources.
A heterodyne detection setup effectively measures phase de-randomization.
The method provides a lower bound on isolation needed to prevent injection-locking attacks.
Abstract
While ideal quantum key distribution (QKD) systems are well-understood, practical implementations face various vulnerabilities, such as side-channel attacks resulting from device imperfections. Current security proofs for decoy-state BB84 protocols either assume uniform phase randomization of Alice's signals, which is compromised by practical limitations and attacks like injection locking, or rely on a (partially) characterized phase distribution. This work presents an experimental method to characterize the phase de-randomization from injection locking using a heterodyne detection setup, providing a lower bound on the degree of isolation required to protect QKD transmitters against injection-locking attacks. The methods presented are source-agnostic and can be used to evaluate general QKD systems against injection-locking attacks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
