TL;DR
This paper evaluates the adversarial robustness of information bottleneck-based deep neural networks in task-oriented communication, revealing vulnerabilities and robustness patterns related to bottleneck depth and task complexity.
Contribution
It provides empirical analysis of how IB-based models' robustness varies with architecture and task complexity, highlighting security implications for neural network-based communication systems.
Findings
Shallow IB models are less robust than deep IB models.
Robustness varies with task complexity and bottleneck depth.
IB-based systems are more resilient to high-intensity pixel attacks.
Abstract
This paper investigates the adversarial robustness of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) using Information Bottleneck (IB) objectives for task-oriented communication systems. We empirically demonstrate that while IB-based approaches provide baseline resilience against attacks targeting downstream tasks, the reliance on generative models for task-oriented communication introduces new vulnerabilities. Through extensive experiments on several datasets, we analyze how bottleneck depth and task complexity influence adversarial robustness. Our key findings show that Shallow Variational Bottleneck Injection (SVBI) provides less adversarial robustness compared to Deep Variational Information Bottleneck (DVIB) approaches, with the gap widening for more complex tasks. Additionally, we reveal that IB-based objectives exhibit stronger robustness against attacks focusing on salient pixels with high…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
