Physics Instrument Design with Reinforcement Learning
Shah Rukh Qasim, Patrick Owen, and Nicola Serra

TL;DR
This paper advocates using Reinforcement Learning for physics instrument design, demonstrating its advantages over traditional gradient-based methods through empirical studies on calorimeter segmentation and spectrometer component placement.
Contribution
It introduces a reinforcement learning framework for physics instrument design, enabling flexible, discrete, and exploratory optimization beyond fixed-parameter models.
Findings
RL effectively segments calorimeters and optimizes spectrometer components.
RL's exploratory nature reduces local optima risk.
The approach is scalable for complex future physics instruments.
Abstract
We present a case for the use of Reinforcement Learning (RL) for the design of physics instrument as an alternative to gradient-based instrument-optimization methods. It's applicability is demonstrated using two empirical studies. One is longitudinal segmentation of calorimeters and the second is both transverse segmentation as well longitudinal placement of trackers in a spectrometer. Based on these experiments, we propose an alternative approach that offers unique advantages over differentiable programming and surrogate-based differentiable design optimization methods. First, Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms possess inherent exploratory capabilities, which help mitigate the risk of convergence to local optima. Second, this approach eliminates the necessity of constraining the design to a predefined detector model with fixed parameters. Instead, it allows for the flexible…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
