TL;DR
This study introduces COCOXGEN, a new dataset, and investigates how prompt detail affects the detectability of AI-generated images by humans and AI detectors, revealing that more detailed prompts produce images that are easier to identify as fake.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel dataset, COCOXGEN, and provides a comparative analysis of human and AI detection performance based on prompt detail in AI-generated images.
Findings
Longer prompts lead to higher detection accuracy for humans.
AI detectors perform better on images generated with detailed prompts.
Humans and AI focus on different image features for detection.
Abstract
With the advent of publicly available AI-based text-to-image systems, the process of creating photorealistic but fully synthetic images has been largely democratized. This can pose a threat to the public through a simplified spread of disinformation. Machine detectors and human media expertise can help to differentiate between AI-generated (fake) and real images and counteract this danger. Although AI generation models are highly prompt-dependent, the impact of the prompt on the fake detection performance has rarely been investigated yet. This work therefore examines the influence of the prompt's level of detail on the detectability of fake images, both with an AI detector and in a user study. For this purpose, we create a novel dataset, COCOXGEN, which consists of real photos from the COCO dataset as well as images generated with SDXL and Fooocus using prompts of two standardized…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsSoftmax · Attention Is All You Need
