Methods to Assess the UK Government's Current Role as a Data Provider for AI

TL;DR

This paper introduces two methods to evaluate the UK government's data contribution to AI training, revealing that government websites are significant data sources for LLMs, while open datasets are less influential.

Contribution

It presents novel assessment methods for government data usage in AI training, addressing the challenge of opaque training corpora and offering a framework for organizations.

Findings

UK government websites are important data sources for AI.

Data.gov.uk is not a significant data source for AI.

Proposed methods are reproducible and applicable beyond the UK.

Abstract

Governments typically collect and steward a vast amount of high-quality data on their citizens and institutions, and the UK government is exploring how it can better publish and provision this data to the benefit of the AI landscape. However, the compositions of generative AI training corpora remain closely guarded secrets, making the planning of data sharing initiatives difficult. To address this, we devise two methods to assess UK government data usage for the training of Large Language Models (LLMs) and 'peek behind the curtain' in order to observe the UK government's current contributions as a data provider for AI. The first method, an ablation study that utilises LLM 'unlearning', seeks to examine the importance of the information held on UK government websites for LLMs and their performance in citizen query tasks. The second method, an information leakage study, seeks to ascertain whether LLMs are aware of the information held in the datasets published on the UK government's open data initiative data$.$gov$.$uk. Our findings indicate that UK government websites are important data sources for AI (heterogenously across subject matters) while data$.$gov$.$uk is not. This paper serves as a technical report, explaining in-depth the designs, mechanics, and limitations of the above experiments. It is accompanied by a complementary non-technical report on the ODI website in which we summarise the experiments and key findings, interpret them, and build a set of actionable recommendations for the UK government to take forward as it seeks to design AI policy. While we focus on UK open government data, we believe that the methods introduced in this paper present a reproducible approach to tackle the opaqueness of AI training corpora and provide organisations a framework to evaluate and maximize their contributions to AI development.