Helmholtz-Hodge Decomposition on Graphs
Peter March

TL;DR
This paper extends the Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition to finite graphs by defining curl as a projection related to circulation, establishing fundamental vector calculus operators on graphs.
Contribution
It introduces a novel definition of curl on graphs, proves the exact sequence of gradient, curl, and divergence, and develops analogues of classical vector calculus theorems for graphs.
Findings
Curl is a non-local operator on graphs.
Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition holds on graphs.
Analogues of divergence theorem and Green's identities are established.
Abstract
We propose a definition of the curl of a vector field X on a finite simple graph as the projection of X onto the orthogonal complement of circulation-free vector fields, where a vector field is circulation-free provided its line integral around every simple circuit vanishes. We justify the definition by observing that X and curl X have the same circulation and curl of the gradient and divergence of the curl vanish. This shows the gradient, curl, and divergence operators form an exact sequence, in analogy with the classical case of vector fields on Euclidean domains and yields the Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition of a vector field on a graph as the sum of a gradient, a curl, and a harmonic field. Along the way, we also prove analogues of the divergence theorem, Green's identities, and Helmholtz's theorem. A consequence of our definition is that the curl is a non-local operator, in sharp…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRings, Modules, and Algebras · advanced mathematical theories · graph theory and CDMA systems
